Text-to-image models, measured
Every generator in the AI Image Studio, on three numbers: a blind quality score across six kinds of prompt, timed render speed, and the price of an image.
Benchmark v1.0 · 29 October 2026 · 312 images scored · 26 models · 12 vendors
Qualityv1.0 · blind
GoCrazy Image Quality Index · v1.0 · 0 to 100 · Higher is better
- Seedream 5.0 Pro97
- Nano Banana Pro97
- GPT-Image 1.597
- Seedream 5.096
- Nano Banana 2.196
- GPT-Image 296
- Grok Imagine96
- WAN 2.7 Pro96
- Riverflow 2.0 Pro96
- Recraft V4.1 Pro96
- Seedream 5.0 Flash95
- Nano Banana 295
- FLUX.2 Max95
- WAN 2.795
- FLUX.2 Pro95
- FLUX.294
- Qwen Image 2.094
- Nano Banana94
- MOSS Image94
- Qwen Image 3.093
- Seedream 4.593
- Ideogram V3 Quality92
- Z-Image Turbo91
- Luma Photon91
- FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra90
- MiniMax H389
SpeedBenchmarked
Median seconds from submit to finished image · Lower is better
- Qwen Image 2.05.9s
- Qwen Image 3.010.6s
- MiniMax H310.9s
- FLUX.2 Pro11.4s
- FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra12.8s
- Seedream 4.513s
- Grok Imagine15.5s
- Recraft V4.1 Pro17.6s
- Seedream 5.0 Flash17.8s
- Z-Image Turbo18.7s
- MOSS Image19.5s
- Nano Banana19.9s
- FLUX.220.2s
- Luma Photon20.3s
- Ideogram V3 Quality20.5s
- WAN 2.720.9s
- FLUX.2 Max23.5s
- Nano Banana 225s
- Seedream 5.034s
- Nano Banana 2.135s
- GPT-Image 1.542.6s
- GPT-Image 246.6s
- Nano Banana Pro47.7s
- WAN 2.7 Pro48.6s
- Riverflow 2.0 Pro59.1s
- Seedream 5.0 Pro61.9s
Cost per imagePrice list
Credits per image at the base tier · Lower is better
- FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra1 cr
- FLUX.21 cr
- FLUX.2 Pro1 cr
- GPT-Image 21 cr
- Grok Imagine1 cr
- Luma Photon1 cr
- MiniMax H31 cr
- MOSS Image1 cr
- Nano Banana1 cr
- Nano Banana 2.11 cr
- Qwen Image 2.01 cr
- Seedream 4.51 cr
- Seedream 5.01 cr
- Seedream 5.0 Flash1 cr
- WAN 2.71 cr
- Z-Image Turbo1 cr
- FLUX.2 Max2 cr
- Ideogram V3 Quality2 cr
- Nano Banana 22 cr
- Qwen Image 3.02 cr
- Seedream 5.0 Pro2 cr
- WAN 2.7 Pro2 cr
- GPT-Image 1.53 cr
- Nano Banana Pro3 cr
- Riverflow 2.0 Pro3 cr
- Recraft V4.1 Pro4 cr
Best for each job
- Best overallSeedream 5.0 Pro97 · tied with Nano Banana Pro, GPT-Image 1.5
- Best for peopleGPT-Image 297 · tied with 3 others
- Best for productNano Banana 2.198 · tied with 7 others
- Best for textSeedream 5.0 Flash98 · tied with 6 others
- Best for illustrationGPT-Image 1.598
- Best for sceneGPT-Image 298 · tied with 7 others
- Best for compositionSeedream 5.0 Flash98 · tied with 5 others
- Best valueSeedream 5.096.3 pts/credit
- FastestQwen Image 2.05.9 s
Scoreboard
| # | Model | Vendor | Quality | People | Product | Text | Illustration | Scene | Composition | Median s | Credits | ≈ USD | Max res | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seedream 5.0 Pro | ByteDance | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 96 | 98 | 98 | 61.9 | 2 | $0.38 | 2K | Try → |
| 2 | Nano Banana Pro | 97 | 95 | 98 | 98 | 94 | 96 | 98 | 47.7 | 3 | $0.57 | 2K | Try → | |
| 3 | GPT-Image 1.5 | OpenAI | 97 | 95 | 97 | 96 | 98 | 98 | 96 | 42.6 | 3 | $0.57 | 1.5K | Try → |
| 4 | Seedream 5.0 | ByteDance | 96 | 95 | 97 | 98 | 94 | 96 | 98 | 34 | 1 | $0.19 | 2K | Try → |
| 5 | Nano Banana 2.1 | 96 | 95 | 98 | 96 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 35 | 1 | $0.19 | 4K | Try → | |
| 6 | GPT-Image 2 | OpenAI | 96 | 97 | 98 | 95 | 95 | 98 | 96 | 46.6 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 7 | Grok Imagine | xAI | 96 | 95 | 97 | 98 | 93 | 97 | 97 | 15.5 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 8 | WAN 2.7 Pro | Alibaba | 96 | 95 | 96 | 94 | 96 | 97 | 97 | 48.6 | 2 | $0.38 | 2K | Try → |
| 9 | Riverflow 2.0 Pro | Sourceful | 96 | 94 | 98 | 96 | 97 | 95 | 95 | 59.1 | 3 | $0.57 | 1K | Try → |
| 10 | Recraft V4.1 Pro | Recraft | 96 | 95 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 96 | 98 | 17.6 | 4 | $0.76 | 1K | Try → |
| 11 | Seedream 5.0 Flash | ByteDance | 95 | 95 | 98 | 98 | 87 | 95 | 98 | 17.8 | 1 | $0.19 | 2K | Try → |
| 12 | Nano Banana 2 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 94 | 94 | 97 | 97 | 25 | 2 | $0.38 | 2K | Try → | |
| 13 | FLUX.2 Max | Black Forest Labs | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 94 | 98 | 89 | 23.5 | 2 | $0.38 | 1K | Try → |
| 14 | WAN 2.7 | Alibaba | 95 | 94 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 98 | 92 | 20.9 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 15 | FLUX.2 Pro | Black Forest Labs | 95 | 95 | 97 | 96 | 95 | 98 | 90 | 11.4 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 16 | FLUX.2 | Black Forest Labs | 94 | 95 | 97 | 98 | 94 | 98 | 85 | 20.2 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 17 | Qwen Image 2.0 | Alibaba | 94 | 95 | 98 | 93 | 95 | 95 | 90 | 5.9 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 18 | Nano Banana | 94 | 95 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 98 | 85 | 19.9 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → | |
| 19 | MOSS Image | MOSS | 94 | 96 | 94 | 86 | 93 | 95 | 98 | 19.5 | 1 | $0.19 | 2K | Try → |
| 20 | Qwen Image 3.0 | Alibaba | 93 | 95 | 98 | 86 | 94 | 97 | 91 | 10.6 | 2 | $0.38 | 1.5K | Try → |
| 21 | Seedream 4.5 | ByteDance | 93 | 95 | 85 | 96 | 97 | 97 | 89 | 13 | 1 | $0.19 | 2K | Try → |
| 22 | Ideogram V3 Quality | Ideogram | 92 | 96 | 95 | 91 | 97 | 95 | 81 | 20.5 | 2 | $0.38 | 1K | Try → |
| 23 | Z-Image Turbo | Alibaba | 91 | 95 | 97 | 96 | 92 | 95 | 72 | 18.7 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 24 | Luma Photon | Luma | 91 | 94 | 94 | 86 | 95 | 97 | 81 | 20.3 | 1 | $0.19 | 1K | Try → |
| 25 | FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra | Black Forest Labs | 90 | 95 | 90 | 80 | 91 | 94 | 89 | 12.8 | 1 | $0.19 | 4MP | Try → |
| 26 | MiniMax H3 | MiniMax | 89 | 91 | 86 | 83 | 93 | 94 | 88 | 10.9 | 1 | $0.19 | 2K | Try → |
Ranked by unrounded overall quality, then price; models within 1 point are effectively tied. Category cells are the mean of that category's two prompts. Credits are per image at the base resolution tier; USD is at the Premium plan rate of $0.19 per credit. Higher resolutions can cost more, see pricing.
Same prompt, every model
The images behind the scores, ranked best to worst within each prompt. All of them are AI-generated outputs from the benchmark run, untouched.
PeopleStudio portrait of a woman in her forties with silver-streaked hair, soft window light from the left, neutral grey background, 85mm look, natural skin texture


























PeopleA barista in a linen apron laughing while pouring latte art, warm cafe interior, shallow depth of field, candid editorial style


























ProductA matte black ceramic coffee mug on a walnut table, single soft light from the left, minimal studio backdrop, product photography


























ProductA pair of white running shoes floating mid-air over a pastel pink background, even studio lighting, catalogue shot


























TextA vintage cinema marquee at dusk with the words OPEN ALL NIGHT in bold red letters, neon glow, wet street reflections


























TextA minimalist poster with the single word BALANCE in large serif type centred on cream paper, one small green circle below the word


























IllustrationAnime-style illustration of a young woman with a red umbrella standing on a rainy city street at night, cel shading, vibrant neon reflections


























IllustrationFlat vector illustration of a cosy reading nook with a cat asleep on an armchair, limited palette of four colours, clean geometric shapes


























SceneA modern glass house on a cliff at golden hour, long shadows, calm ocean below, architectural photography


























SceneMisty pine forest at dawn with rays of light through the trees and a narrow wooden boardwalk, wide angle


























CompositionThree red apples and one green pear arranged in a single row on a blue plate, top-down view, white tablecloth


























CompositionA small orange robot holding a yellow umbrella standing to the left of a tall blue mailbox, overcast day, photoreal


























How the benchmark works
- One suite, every model12 fixed prompts, two per category. Square format, base tier, no negative prompt, no seed, no retries. What the model returns first is what gets scored.
- Blind scoringA vision model sees only the prompt and the image, never the model name. Prompt adherence 50%, technical quality 30%, aesthetics 20%. Two passes, averaged.
- Real pipeline timingSeconds are measured from submit to finished file through the same API the studio calls, so queueing and delivery count, exactly as a user experiences them.
- Published evidenceEvery image that produced a score is shown above. If a model returns an error instead of an image, that is recorded as no output, not as a low score.
What this measures
Quality is a blind score on a fixed prompt suite. The six categories, people, product, text, illustration, scene, composition, cover the jobs people actually bring to a generator, and the per-category cells in the scoreboard matter more than the single overall number.
Speed is the median of the benchmark renders per model, submit to finished image.
Cost is the published credit price for one image at the base tier.
What it does not measure
GoCrazyAI sells access to every model on this page. These numbers are measurements, not editorial picks, and they are not adjusted for margin. Two prompts per category is a small sample; a model that is a few points behind is not meaningfully worse on that job.
The judge saturates near the top: on this suite most strong models land between 93 and 98, and differences under 1 point are inside its noise. Where leaders are that close the page says so and shows them as a tie. Ordering within a tie is by unrounded mean, then price.
All images are AI-generated. No score on this page is a review or rating of a product for structured-data purposes; the dataset is published as a dataset.
Questions
- Which text-to-image model has the best quality?
- In benchmark v1.0 (29 October 2026) Seedream 5.0 Pro, Nano Banana Pro, GPT-Image 1.5 finished within 1 point of each other at the top of the GoCrazy Image Quality Index, which is inside the judge's noise, so they are reported as a tie. Seedream 5.0 Pro has the highest unrounded mean at 97.3.
- Which text-to-image model is the fastest?
- Qwen Image 2.0 had the lowest median time from submit to finished image at 5.9 seconds across the benchmark prompts.
- Which text-to-image model is the cheapest?
- Nano Banana 2.1 is among the lowest-priced generators at 1 credit per image, about $0.19 on the Premium plan. 16 of the 26 models cost one credit at the base tier.
- Which model gives the most quality per credit?
- Seedream 5.0: 96 quality points for 1 credit, the best ratio in the index.
- How is the Quality Index measured?
- Every generator renders the same 12 prompts at matched settings: square format, base tier, no negative prompt, no seed. Each image is scored blind by a vision model on prompt adherence, technical quality and aesthetics, weighted 50/30/20, in two passes that are averaged, then normalised to 0-100. The 6 categories are people, product, text, illustration, scene, composition.
- Where do the speed numbers come from?
- From the benchmark run itself: wall-clock seconds from submit to finished image through the same API the AI Image Studio uses, so queueing and file delivery are included. They reflect our infrastructure and the provider queue on the day measured.
