Black Forest Labs · text-to-image
1K tiers · 3 reference images, seed
Benchmark v1.0 · 29 October 2026 · 26 models
FLUX.2 Max
Top FLUX.2 detail and adherence.
- Best for texttied
- Best for scenetied
- Text rendering (OCR)tied
Benchmark record 12 prompts · v1.0
Accumulated benchmark v1.0 · price list
Five ways of judging rank out of 26
Adherence, technical and aesthetics come from a blind vision-model judge; text and counts are objective checks. The overall index blends the first three 50/30/20.
Profile by prompt type axis 85–100
Output map every render, unretouched












AI-generated. First result returned, no retries, no editing.
Against the field FLUX.2 Max vs median · axis 85–100
Reading the card
FLUX.2 Max finishes 13th of 26 on the overall index at 95.1.
Its strongest kind of prompt is scene (98 against a field median of 96.5); its weakest is composition (89 against 93.5).
OCR found the exact words in 100% of the text prompts and 90% of the count, colour and placement checks passed.
A render takes a median 23.5 s, 17th of 26 for speed and slower than the field median of 20.3 s, and costs 2 credits (about $0.38 on the Premium plan), which puts it 20th of 26 on quality per credit.
Pick it for
- Scene98 · 1st of 26 · landscape and architecture, depth, light direction
- Text97.5 · 5th of 26 · exact words rendered legibly, no extra characters
Weigh up
- Composition89 · 18th of 26 · object counts, colours and left/right placement
- Counts90% of count, colour and placement checks passed
- Speed23.5 s median is slower than the field’s 20.3 s
- Price2 credits per image, 17th of 26 on price; 16 models in the index cost one
Nearest rivals closest overall scores
In the studio what you can set
- Vendor
- Black Forest Labs
- Resolution tiers
- 1K
- Highest output
- 1K
- Reference images
- Up to 3
- Images per request
- 1
- Seed
- Yes
- Negative prompt
- No
- Base price
- 2 credits · ≈ $0.38
Questions about FLUX.2 Max
- Is FLUX.2 Max good at rendering text in images?
- In benchmark v1.0 the OCR check found the exact requested phrase in 100% of FLUX.2 Max's text-prompt renders, and the blind judge gave its text category 97.5 out of 100 (field median 95.5). Every word came out exactly as written.
- How fast is FLUX.2 Max?
- Median 23.5 seconds from submit to finished image across the 12 benchmark prompts, with the slowest tenth at 31 seconds. That is 17th of 26 models; the field median is 20.3 seconds.
- How much does FLUX.2 Max cost per image?
- 2 credits at the base 1K tier, about $0.38 at the Premium plan rate of $0.19 per credit. Higher resolution tiers can cost more; see pricing.
- FLUX.2 Max or Seedream 5.0 Flash?
- Seedream 5.0 Flash scores 95.2 overall against 95.1 for FLUX.2 Max, inside the judge’s noise, so treat them as equal on quality and decide on speed and price. FLUX.2 Max renders in 23.5 s for 2 credits; Seedream 5.0 Flash in 17.8 s for 1 credit.
- What is FLUX.2 Max best used for?
- It ranks in the top three for scene prompts in this run. Top FLUX.2 detail and adherence.
- How long has FLUX.2 Max been at the top?
- FLUX.2 Max is currently 13th; its best rank across 1 benchmark run is #13.
- How were these numbers measured?
- Every model rendered the same 12 prompts at matched settings. A vision-model judge scored each image blind on adherence, technical quality and aesthetics (blended 50/30/20 into the overall index); OCR and fixed yes/no checks measured text accuracy and composition without a judge. Seconds were timed through the production API. Benchmark v1.0, 29 October 2026.
