GoCrazyAI
GoCrazyAI
overall95
rank#13
credits2
median s24
max res1K
13th

Black Forest Labs · text-to-image

1K tiers · 3 reference images, seed

Benchmark v1.0 · 29 October 2026 · 26 models

FLUX.2 Max

Top FLUX.2 detail and adherence.

  • Best for texttied
  • Best for scenetied
  • Text rendering (OCR)tied
0weeks at #1
0weeks in top 3
0weeks in top 10
#13best rank1 benchmark run · in index since 29 October 2026

Benchmark record 12 prompts · v1.0

PromptScoreAdhTechAesSecPos
PeopleStudio portrait of a woman in her forties with silver-streaked hair, soft window light from the left, neutral grey background, 85mm look, natural skin textureExcellent adherence and quality with a pleasing aesthetic.9798959522.23/26
PeopleA barista in a linen apron laughing while pouring latte art, warm cafe interior, shallow depth of field, candid editorial styleExcellent depiction with warm, candid style and accurate elements.9495939419.918/26
ProductA matte black ceramic coffee mug on a walnut table, single soft light from the left, minimal studio backdrop, product photographyExcellent adherence and quality, very professional look.981009595221/26
ProductA pair of white running shoes floating mid-air over a pastel pink background, even studio lighting, catalogue shotExcellent adherence and quality; professional catalogue shot.9595959517.712/26
TextA vintage cinema marquee at dusk with the words OPEN ALL NIGHT in bold red letters, neon glow, wet street reflectionsPerfect adherence with excellent quality and aesthetics.98100959528.81/26
TextA minimalist poster with the single word BALANCE in large serif type centred on cream paper, one small green circle below the wordPerfect adherence with clean execution and pleasing minimalism.97100959022.315/26
IllustrationAnime-style illustration of a young woman with a red umbrella standing on a rainy city street at night, cel shading, vibrant neon reflectionsExcellent adherence to prompt with high-quality execution and aesthetics.95959595318/26
IllustrationFlat vector illustration of a cosy reading nook with a cat asleep on an armchair, limited palette of four colours, clean geometric shapesExcellent adherence with clean geometric shapes and limited palette.9395909235.413/26
SceneA modern glass house on a cliff at golden hour, long shadows, calm ocean below, architectural photographyExcellent adherence and high-quality architectural photography.98100959528.71/26
SceneMisty pine forest at dawn with rays of light through the trees and a narrow wooden boardwalk, wide angleBeautifully captures the misty forest with light rays and boardwalk.981009595181/26
CompositionThree red apples and one green pear arranged in a single row on a blue plate, top-down view, white tableclothMissing one red apple, otherwise well-executed.8075858524.620/26
CompositionA small orange robot holding a yellow umbrella standing to the left of a tall blue mailbox, overcast day, photorealPerfect adherence with high-quality and pleasing aesthetics.98100959530.91/26

Accumulated benchmark v1.0 · price list

12images scored
23.5median seconds
31p90 seconds
2credits / image
$0.38≈ usd / image
47.5quality per credit
1Kmax resolution
3reference images
1per request

Five ways of judging rank out of 26

Overall index95.1Overall index: 95.1 · field median 94.913th of 26
Prompt adherence96.1Prompt adherence: 96.1 · field median 95.611th of 26
Technical quality93.6Technical quality: 93.6 · field median 93.915th of 26
Aesthetics93.4Aesthetics: 93.4 · field median 93.817th of 26
Text rendering (OCR)100%Text rendering (OCR): 100% · field median 100%1st of 26
Counts & placement90%Counts & placement: 90% · field median 100%15th of 26

Adherence, technical and aesthetics come from a blind vision-model judge; text and counts are objective checks. The overall index blends the first three 50/30/20.

Profile by prompt type axis 85–100

People: 95.5 (field median 95)People95.5Product: 96.5 (field median 96.5)Product96.5Text: 97.5 (field median 95.5)Text97.5Illustration: 94 (field median 94)Illustration94Scene: 98 (field median 96.5)Scene98Composition: 89 (field median 93.5)Composition89
FLUX.2 MaxField median (26 models)

Against the field FLUX.2 Max vs median · axis 85–100

859095100People: FLUX.2 Max 95.5 · field median 95People95.5Product: FLUX.2 Max 96.5 · field median 96.5Product96.5Text: FLUX.2 Max 97.5 · field median 95.5Text97.5Illustration: FLUX.2 Max 94 · field median 94Illustration94Scene: FLUX.2 Max 98 · field median 96.5Scene98Composition: FLUX.2 Max 89 · field median 93.5Composition89Prompt adherence: FLUX.2 Max 96.1 · field median 95.6Prompt adherence96.1Technical quality: FLUX.2 Max 93.6 · field median 93.9Technical quality93.6Aesthetics: FLUX.2 Max 93.4 · field median 93.8Aesthetics93.4
FLUX.2 MaxField median

Reading the card

FLUX.2 Max finishes 13th of 26 on the overall index at 95.1.

Its strongest kind of prompt is scene (98 against a field median of 96.5); its weakest is composition (89 against 93.5).

OCR found the exact words in 100% of the text prompts and 90% of the count, colour and placement checks passed.

A render takes a median 23.5 s, 17th of 26 for speed and slower than the field median of 20.3 s, and costs 2 credits (about $0.38 on the Premium plan), which puts it 20th of 26 on quality per credit.

Pick it for

  • Scene98 · 1st of 26 · landscape and architecture, depth, light direction
  • Text97.5 · 5th of 26 · exact words rendered legibly, no extra characters

Weigh up

  • Composition89 · 18th of 26 · object counts, colours and left/right placement
  • Counts90% of count, colour and placement checks passed
  • Speed23.5 s median is slower than the field’s 20.3 s
  • Price2 credits per image, 17th of 26 on price; 16 models in the index cost one

Nearest rivals closest overall scores

In the studio what you can set

Vendor
Black Forest Labs
Resolution tiers
1K
Highest output
1K
Reference images
Up to 3
Images per request
1
Seed
Yes
Negative prompt
No
Base price
2 credits · ≈ $0.38

Questions about FLUX.2 Max

Is FLUX.2 Max good at rendering text in images?
In benchmark v1.0 the OCR check found the exact requested phrase in 100% of FLUX.2 Max's text-prompt renders, and the blind judge gave its text category 97.5 out of 100 (field median 95.5). Every word came out exactly as written.
How fast is FLUX.2 Max?
Median 23.5 seconds from submit to finished image across the 12 benchmark prompts, with the slowest tenth at 31 seconds. That is 17th of 26 models; the field median is 20.3 seconds.
How much does FLUX.2 Max cost per image?
2 credits at the base 1K tier, about $0.38 at the Premium plan rate of $0.19 per credit. Higher resolution tiers can cost more; see pricing.
FLUX.2 Max or Seedream 5.0 Flash?
Seedream 5.0 Flash scores 95.2 overall against 95.1 for FLUX.2 Max, inside the judge’s noise, so treat them as equal on quality and decide on speed and price. FLUX.2 Max renders in 23.5 s for 2 credits; Seedream 5.0 Flash in 17.8 s for 1 credit.
What is FLUX.2 Max best used for?
It ranks in the top three for scene prompts in this run. Top FLUX.2 detail and adherence.
How long has FLUX.2 Max been at the top?
FLUX.2 Max is currently 13th; its best rank across 1 benchmark run is #13.
How were these numbers measured?
Every model rendered the same 12 prompts at matched settings. A vision-model judge scored each image blind on adherence, technical quality and aesthetics (blended 50/30/20 into the overall index); OCR and fixed yes/no checks measured text accuracy and composition without a judge. Seconds were timed through the production API. Benchmark v1.0, 29 October 2026.
Generate with FLUX.2 Max2 credits per image · same studio, every model.