Google · text-to-image
1K · 2K · 4K tiers · 10 reference images
Benchmark v1.0 · 29 October 2026 · 26 models
Nano Banana 2.1
Newest Google model. Sharp design and text rendering, up to 4K.
- Best for producttied
- Technical qualitytied
- Aestheticstied
- Text rendering (OCR)tied
- Counts & placementtied
Benchmark record 12 prompts · v1.0
Accumulated benchmark v1.0 · price list
Five ways of judging rank out of 26
Adherence, technical and aesthetics come from a blind vision-model judge; text and counts are objective checks. The overall index blends the first three 50/30/20.
Profile by prompt type axis 90–100
Output map every render, unretouched












AI-generated. First result returned, no retries, no editing.
Against the field Nano Banana 2.1 vs median · axis 90–100
Reading the card
Nano Banana 2.1 finishes 5th of 26 on the overall index at 96.2.
Its strongest kind of prompt is product (98 against a field median of 96.5); its weakest is people (95 against 95).
OCR found the exact words in 100% of the text prompts and 100% of the count, colour and placement checks passed.
A render takes a median 35 s, 20th of 26 for speed and slower than the field median of 20.3 s, and costs 1 credit (about $0.19 on the Premium plan), which puts it 2nd of 26 on quality per credit.
Pick it for
- Product98 · 1st of 26 · clean studio lighting, material fidelity, catalogue framing
- Illustration96 · 5th of 26 · holding a named art style with clean shapes and palette
- Composition95.5 · 10th of 26 · object counts, colours and left/right placement
- Value96.2 quality points per credit, 2nd of 26
Weigh up
- People95 · 6th of 26 · skin, hands, eyes and natural light on a human subject
- Speed35 s median is slower than the field’s 20.3 s
Nearest rivals closest overall scores
In the studio what you can set
- Vendor
- Resolution tiers
- 1K, 2K, 4K
- Highest output
- 4K
- Reference images
- Up to 10
- Images per request
- 1
- Seed
- No
- Negative prompt
- No
- Base price
- 1 credit · ≈ $0.19
Questions about Nano Banana 2.1
- Is Nano Banana 2.1 good at rendering text in images?
- In benchmark v1.0 the OCR check found the exact requested phrase in 100% of Nano Banana 2.1's text-prompt renders, and the blind judge gave its text category 96 out of 100 (field median 95.5). Every word came out exactly as written.
- How fast is Nano Banana 2.1?
- Median 35 seconds from submit to finished image across the 12 benchmark prompts, with the slowest tenth at 53.3 seconds. That is 20th of 26 models; the field median is 20.3 seconds.
- How much does Nano Banana 2.1 cost per image?
- 1 credit at the base 1K tier, about $0.19 at the Premium plan rate of $0.19 per credit. Higher resolution tiers (2K, 4K) can cost more; see pricing.
- Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT-Image 2?
- GPT-Image 2 scores 96.2 overall against 96.2 for Nano Banana 2.1, inside the judge’s noise, so treat them as equal on quality and decide on speed and price. Nano Banana 2.1 renders in 35 s for 1 credit; GPT-Image 2 in 46.6 s for 1 credit.
- What is Nano Banana 2.1 best used for?
- It ranks in the top three for product prompts in this run. Newest Google model. Sharp design and text rendering, up to 4K.
- How long has Nano Banana 2.1 been at the top?
- Nano Banana 2.1 is currently 5th; its best rank across 1 benchmark run is #5, and it has been in the top 10 for 1 week.
- How were these numbers measured?
- Every model rendered the same 12 prompts at matched settings. A vision-model judge scored each image blind on adherence, technical quality and aesthetics (blended 50/30/20 into the overall index); OCR and fixed yes/no checks measured text accuracy and composition without a judge. Seconds were timed through the production API. Benchmark v1.0, 29 October 2026.
