GoCrazyAI
GoCrazyAI

Benchmark · tested September 27, 2026

AI Image Upscaler Benchmark: 8 Models, Same Photos

Crystal, Ultimate, SeedVR2, VOSR2, Recraft Crisp, Phota and Clarity Pro, side by side on the same five images. We checked the two things that matter: does it get sharper, and does it stay the same picture?

The short version

#1 · Best overall4 credits

Crystal Upscaler · Clarity AI

Sharpest result on badly damaged photos while keeping faces, text and products the same. On one 320-pixel room it chose a plausible leaf shape for a plant that had no detail left.

#2 · Best value1 credit

Ultimate Image Upscaler · WaveSpeed AI

Faithful everywhere and clean on text and products. A step softer than Crystal on the most damaged face and room.

#3 · Best budget1 credit

SeedVR2 · Open model, hosted by WaveSpeed

Never changed what was in the picture. Close to the leaders on a clean input, visibly soft on heavily compressed ones.

#4 · Faithful, soft1 credit

VOSR2 · Open model, hosted by WaveSpeed

Faithful and quick, but the softest of the faithful group: the neon sign and the damaged face stayed blurry.

#5 · Faithful, soft1 credit

Image Upscaler · WaveSpeed AI

The engine GoCrazyAI used until this test. Keeps everything the same and handles text well, but damaged faces and rooms stay soft.

#6 · Budget, fixed size1 credit

Crisp Upscale · Recraft

Faithful and only 1 credit, but the output is always about 4 MP, so it cannot reach 4K or 8K.

#7 · Regenerates3 credits

Phota Enhance · Phota

Very crisp, but it regenerates rather than upscales: it changed eye colour, added a tread pattern to a plain sole, and replaced letterbox bars with invented buildings and street.

#8 · Changes content8 credits

Pro Upscaler · Clarity AI

The most expensive and slowest, and it changed something in every test: a different face, the sign "RAMEN" rewritten as "PAVEN", shredded shoelaces with an invented label.

GoCrazyAI runs the model that won this test (Crystal) in its Image Upscaler. We switched to it because of these results; the engine we used before is in the table too.

Compare any two, side by side

Pick a test image and two models, then drag the slider. Start with the input against a model to see what it adds.

Damaged portrait: Crystal Upscaler
Damaged portrait: Input (plain resize)
⇆
Input (plain resize)Crystal UpscalerAI-generated test image

Test 1 · 320 × 200 px, heavy JPEG compression

Damaged portrait: Is it still the same person?

The test that matters most. The input is a tiny, blocky thumbnail. A good upscaler makes it sharp without inventing a new face.

Damaged portrait: input, plainly enlarged
Input · plain resizeInput
Damaged portrait upscaled by Crystal Upscaler: Same face; lashes and skin texture rebuilt
Crystal Upscaler · 4 creditsSame face; lashes and skin texture rebuiltSame + sharp
Damaged portrait upscaled by Ultimate Image Upscaler: Same face, cleaner
Ultimate Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame face, cleanerSame
Damaged portrait upscaled by SeedVR2: Same face, soft
SeedVR2 · 1 creditSame face, softSame, soft
Damaged portrait upscaled by VOSR2: Same face, blocky edges remain
VOSR2 · 1 creditSame face, blocky edges remainSame, soft
Damaged portrait upscaled by Image Upscaler: Same face, still blurry
Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame face, still blurrySame, soft
Damaged portrait upscaled by Crisp Upscale: Same face, clean, ~4 MP only
Crisp Upscale · 1 creditSame face, clean, ~4 MP onlySame
Damaged portrait upscaled by Phota Enhance: Crisp, but eye colour changed to grey-blue
Phota Enhance · 3 creditsCrisp, but eye colour changed to grey-blueChanged
Damaged portrait upscaled by Pro Upscaler: Different face: new eyes, brows, skin tone
Pro Upscaler · 8 creditsDifferent face: new eyes, brows, skin toneChanged

Test 2 · 320 × 200 px, medium JPEG compression

Text on a neon sign: Does the text still say the same thing?

Upscalers that "imagine" detail tend to imagine letters too. The sign reads RAMEN.

Text on a neon sign: input, plainly enlarged
Input · plain resizeInput
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Crystal Upscaler: RAMEN, crisp; rain streaks kept
Crystal Upscaler · 4 creditsRAMEN, crisp; rain streaks keptSame + sharp
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Ultimate Image Upscaler: RAMEN, crisp edges
Ultimate Image Upscaler · 1 creditRAMEN, crisp edgesSame + sharp
Text on a neon sign upscaled by SeedVR2: RAMEN, clean
SeedVR2 · 1 creditRAMEN, cleanSame
Text on a neon sign upscaled by VOSR2: RAMEN, still blurry
VOSR2 · 1 creditRAMEN, still blurrySame, soft
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Image Upscaler: RAMEN, clean
Image Upscaler · 1 creditRAMEN, cleanSame
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Crisp Upscale: RAMEN, clean
Crisp Upscale · 1 creditRAMEN, cleanSame
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Phota Enhance: RAMEN, but the whole frame was regenerated (see below)
Phota Enhance · 3 creditsRAMEN, but the whole frame was regenerated (see below)Changed
Text on a neon sign upscaled by Pro Upscaler: Rewritten as "PAVEN"
Pro Upscaler · 8 creditsRewritten as "PAVEN"Changed

Phota regenerated the whole frame

The input was a letterboxed shot with black bars. Phota removed the bars and invented what was never there: buildings and an extra sign above, a wet street and reflections below, and a different aspect ratio. That is image generation, not upscaling.

Letterboxed input frame
Input, full frame
Phota output with invented buildings and street
Phota Enhance, full frame

Test 3 · 256 × 320 px, medium JPEG compression

Product photo: Is it still the same shoe?

For a shop listing, a changed product is worse than a soft one. Watch the laces, the stitching and the sole.

Product photo: input, plainly enlarged
Input · plain resizeInput
Product photo upscaled by Crystal Upscaler: Same shoe; leather grain and stitching rebuilt
Crystal Upscaler · 4 creditsSame shoe; leather grain and stitching rebuiltSame + sharp
Product photo upscaled by Ultimate Image Upscaler: Same shoe, crisp laces
Ultimate Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame shoe, crisp lacesSame + sharp
Product photo upscaled by SeedVR2: Same shoe, soft
SeedVR2 · 1 creditSame shoe, softSame, soft
Product photo upscaled by VOSR2: Same shoe, soft
VOSR2 · 1 creditSame shoe, softSame, soft
Product photo upscaled by Image Upscaler: Same shoe, good laces
Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame shoe, good lacesSame
Product photo upscaled by Crisp Upscale: Same shoe, clean
Crisp Upscale · 1 creditSame shoe, cleanSame
Product photo upscaled by Phota Enhance: Added a tread block to a plain sole
Phota Enhance · 3 creditsAdded a tread block to a plain soleChanged
Product photo upscaled by Pro Upscaler: Laces shredded, invented label text
Pro Upscaler · 8 creditsLaces shredded, invented label textChanged

Test 4 · 320 × 200 px, heavy JPEG compression

Interior: Is it still the same room?

Large soft areas, fine textures and a plant with almost no detail left. The hardest input in the set.

Interior: input, plainly enlarged
Input · plain resizeInput
Interior upscaled by Crystal Upscaler: Same layout, sharp; the unreadable plant became a fiddle-leaf fig
Crystal Upscaler · 4 creditsSame layout, sharp; the unreadable plant became a fiddle-leaf figSame + sharp
Interior upscaled by Ultimate Image Upscaler: Same room, soft
Ultimate Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame room, softSame, soft
Interior upscaled by SeedVR2: Same room, soft
SeedVR2 · 1 creditSame room, softSame, soft
Interior upscaled by VOSR2: Same room, very soft
VOSR2 · 1 creditSame room, very softSame, soft
Interior upscaled by Image Upscaler: Same room, very soft
Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame room, very softSame, soft
Interior upscaled by Crisp Upscale: Same room, moderately sharp
Crisp Upscale · 1 creditSame room, moderately sharpSame
Interior upscaled by Phota Enhance: Sharp, new plant and new wall art
Phota Enhance · 3 creditsSharp, new plant and new wall artChanged
Interior upscaled by Pro Upscaler: Redrew the sofa, plant and wall art
Pro Upscaler · 8 creditsRedrew the sofa, plant and wall artChanged

Test 5 · 512 × 320 px, light JPEG compression

Clean, small portrait: What if the input is already decent?

Most real uploads are small but not wrecked. Here the gap closes: the 1-credit models get close to the leaders.

Clean, small portrait: input, plainly enlarged
Input · plain resizeInput
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Crystal Upscaler: Same face, natural texture
Crystal Upscaler · 4 creditsSame face, natural textureSame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Ultimate Image Upscaler: Same face, good
Ultimate Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame face, goodSame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by SeedVR2: Same face, good
SeedVR2 · 1 creditSame face, goodSame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by VOSR2: Same face, slightly soft
VOSR2 · 1 creditSame face, slightly softSame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Image Upscaler: Same face, good
Image Upscaler · 1 creditSame face, goodSame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Crisp Upscale: Same face, good, ~4 MP only
Crisp Upscale · 1 creditSame face, good, ~4 MP onlySame
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Phota Enhance: Heavier lashes and liner added
Phota Enhance · 3 creditsHeavier lashes and liner addedChanged
Clean, small portrait upscaled by Pro Upscaler: Grey eyes, new makeup, new skin tone
Pro Upscaler · 8 creditsGrey eyes, new makeup, new skin toneChanged

Scoreboard

What each model did to each test image, plus cost in credits, speed and the largest output it offers.

ModelDamaged portraitText on a neon signProduct photoInteriorClean, small portraitCredits / imageMedian timeOutput
Crystal UpscalerClarity AISame + sharpSame + sharpSame + sharpSame + sharpSame4 credits29 s4K (16 MP), up to 1,500 MP
Ultimate Image UpscalerWaveSpeed AISameSame + sharpSame + sharpSame, softSame1 credit42 s4K (16.8 MP), up to 8K
SeedVR2Open model, hosted by WaveSpeedSame, softSameSame, softSame, softSame1 credit46 s4K (16.8 MP), up to 8K
VOSR2Open model, hosted by WaveSpeedSame, softSame, softSame, softSame, softSame1 credit28 s4K (16 MP) maximum
Image UpscalerWaveSpeed AISame, softSameSameSame, softSame1 credit30 s4K (16.8 MP), up to 8K
Crisp UpscaleRecraftSameSameSameSameSame1 credit25 sAbout 4 MP, fixed
Phota EnhancePhotaChangedChangedChangedChangedChanged3 credits33 sAbout 4.3 MP, fixed, aspect ratio changes
Pro UpscalerClarity AIChangedChangedChangedChangedChanged8 credits73 s4K (16 MP), up to 64 MP

Upscale with the winner

The GoCrazyAI Image Upscaler runs Crystal: 2K for 1 credit, 4K for 4, 8K for 13, with a before/after slider and no watermark.

Open the upscaler

How we tested

  1. Five AI-generated images we own, so the full-quality original is known: a portrait, a neon street sign, a sneaker, an interior and the same portrait at a milder size.
  2. Each was shrunk on purpose (to 320, 256 or 512 pixels wide) and re-saved as JPEG, then sent unchanged to every model through the WaveSpeed API on 27 September 2026.
  3. Every model ran at its 4K setting (16 to 17 megapixels) where it has one; Recraft Crisp and Phota only offer a fixed size of about 4 megapixels.
  4. Each tile is the same region of the frame, scaled to the same display size. The input tile is the small image plainly enlarged, which is what you would get without AI.
  5. Tags describe what we saw: "same" means nothing in the picture changed, "changed" means a face, a letter, an object or the framing is different from the input.
  6. Costs are in GoCrazyAI credits per image, worked out from each model's API list price with the same rule we use for every tool. Times are wall-clock medians across the five images, including queue and download.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI image upscaler in 2026?+

In our test, Crystal Upscaler by Clarity AI gave the sharpest results on damaged photos while keeping faces, text and products the same. WaveSpeed's Ultimate Image Upscaler was a close, cheaper second, and SeedVR2 was the best 1-credit option on inputs that were not badly compressed.

Which AI upscaler keeps faces the same?+

Crystal, Ultimate, SeedVR2, VOSR2, Recraft Crisp and WaveSpeed's Image Upscaler all kept the same face in every portrait we tested. Clarity Pro produced a different face each time, and Phota changed eye colour and makeup.

Why do some AI upscalers change the picture?+

Upscalers that are tuned to "imagine" detail fill in whatever looks plausible, and on a small image that can mean new eyes, new letters or a new object. Faithful upscalers only add detail that is consistent with the pixels that are there. For photos of real people, products and text, faithful is what you want.

Do AI upscalers get text right?+

Most did in our test. The neon sign read RAMEN after Crystal, Ultimate, SeedVR2, Recraft Crisp and WaveSpeed's Image Upscaler. Clarity Pro rewrote it as PAVEN, and VOSR2 left it blurry.

How much does it cost to upscale an image to 4K?+

In GoCrazyAI credits per 4K image: 1 credit for SeedVR2, VOSR2, Ultimate, Recraft Crisp or WaveSpeed's Image Upscaler, 3 for Phota, 4 for Crystal and 8 for Clarity Pro. On GoCrazyAI the Image Upscaler runs Crystal: 2K costs 1 credit, 4K costs 4 and 8K costs 13.

Is an expensive upscaler always better?+

No. The most expensive model in the test, Clarity Pro, changed the content of every image we gave it, and so did the second most expensive, Phota. On a clean input, the 1-credit models came within a small margin of the leaders; the extra credits only pay off on badly damaged photos.

Who can use these images?+

Every test image is AI-generated by us and shows an adult or an object, so no real person's likeness is involved. GoCrazyAI is for adults (18+), and uploads to its upscaler are checked automatically before processing.